Description
Custom AS2074 L2B cast steel chute liner plates for combined impact, gouging and abrasive wear.
C-Cr-Mo AS2074 L2B chute liner plates are drawing-based cast wear components based on a medium-carbon chromium-molybdenum steel family. Public EB group capability data uses C 0.55-0.65%, Cr 0.80-1.50% and Mo 0.2-0.4% as an RFQ screening range, supported by controlled sand casting and a project-approved heat-treatment condition.
EB China reviews the liner map, section, fixing, impact, abrasive and required evidence before confirming grade and process. L2B is not high-chromium white iron, not Hadfield manganese steel and not a rolled NM plate. The ordered standard edition, approved chemistry, thermal route, hardness or mechanical requirements and inspection plan govern supply.
Cr-Mo hardenability
Chromium and molybdenum support heat-treatment response below the surface when section and cooling are controlled.
Cast geometry
Ribs, curved profiles, bolt seats and bosses can be integrated into a qualified casting design.
Balanced condition
Hardness is specified together with toughness, support and fracture risk—not maximized in isolation.
Product scope and identity
This page covers custom AS2074 L2B or an explicitly approved L2B-modified cast-steel liner. It is intended for replacement or new-design chute positions where cast shape and a heat-treated strength, hardness and toughness balance are required. Manufacture is to drawing, not a universal stock dimension.
The AS2074 name identifies a material family; it does not automatically specify every casting tolerance, NDT method, repair rule, document or guaranteed service result. Those requirements belong in the quotation, approved drawing and purchase order.
| Definition | Included | Not implied |
|---|---|---|
| Material | AS2074 L2B C-Cr-Mo cast steel to approved edition/specification | High-Cr iron, Ni-Hard, manganese steel or NM plate |
| Condition | Project-approved heat treatment and final verification | One universal HRC for every section |
| Manufacture | Sand-cast custom geometry with required finishing/machining | Plate cut from stock without casting review |
| Performance | Duty-based material candidate | Guaranteed life from chemistry alone |
L2B screening chemical composition
The following public EB group capability range is shown in mass percent for preliminary RFQ discussion. It is not a substitute for the current purchased AS2074 text. Public third-party tables may use different editions or residual limits, so contractual documents must identify the exact standard and any modification.
Heat analysis should report actual results for the ordered elements and link them to the casting heat. If product analysis or residual-element limits are needed, define sampling, method and permissible variation before production.
| Grade | C wt.% | Si max | Mn wt.% | Cr wt.% | Mo wt.% | P max | S max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2074 L2B screening range | 0.55-0.65 | 0.75 | 0.50-1.00 | 0.80-1.50 | 0.2-0.4 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| L2B modified | Approved | Approved | Approved | Approved | Approved | Specified | Specified |
Carbon controls hardness potential
At 0.55-0.65% C in the screening range, L2B has meaningful hardening potential. Carbon also raises welding and cracking sensitivity and changes the amount of toughness available at a selected hardness. The best target is not automatically the upper chemistry or highest HRC.
Carbon must be measured with a suitable laboratory method. Portable XRF can screen many alloy elements but does not directly determine carbon. Grade verification should therefore combine traceable heat chemistry with the approved testing basis.
Chromium and molybdenum work as a system
Chromium supports hardenability and wear response; molybdenum can increase depth of response and resistance to softening during tempering. Their effect depends on carbon, manganese, silicon, austenitizing and the actual quench path. A thick boss cannot be made equivalent to a thin coupon merely by adding Mo.
Both Cr and Mo should appear on the certificate when required. The quotation should state whether the base grade or a modified chemistry is supplied, because an informal “Cr-Mo steel” description is too broad for acceptance.
| Element | Engineering contribution | Control | Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| C | Attainable hardness and strength | Laboratory heat analysis | Higher is not always tougher or longer-wearing |
| Cr | Hardenability and wear response | Range plus section verification | Not a high-Cr white-iron structure |
| Mo | Depth/tempering response | Required range and heat identity | Cannot repair casting hot spots |
| Mn | Deoxidation/hardenability contribution | Range and melt control | Not a high-Mn work-hardening grade |
| Si | Deoxidation and transformation influence | Maximum/actual result | Not a stand-alone wear additive |
| P/S | Cleanliness/toughness concerns | Applicable maximums | Do not ignore residual limits |
Hardness is not hardenability
Hardness describes resistance to indentation at a tested location. Hardenability describes the depth through which the desired structure can form under a defined quench. Buyers often confuse a hard surface result with proof that a heavy casting is uniformly treated.
Specify the scale, prepared locations, reading count and acceptable range. If the core or a bolt boss must meet a criterion, show the depth or representative section on the drawing and agree how it will be tested.
| Evidence | Question answered | Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Surface HRC/HBW | Is this location within the final range? | Does not prove the core |
| Depth/core hardness | Did the section develop sufficient response? | Requires agreed sampling |
| Impact test | Does the specimen meet a defined energy criterion? | Coupon may cool differently |
| Metallography | What structure exists at the sample? | Local evidence only |
| Heat-treatment record | Was the lot processed by the documented route? | Needs result verification |
Casting route and tooling
Resin-sand or sodium-silicate-sand processes may be selected according to geometry, size, quantity and foundry plan. Pattern allowances must cover solidification shrinkage, heat-treatment movement and machining. Cores, parting, gating and risers should be reviewed before tooling release.
A cast liner can integrate curvature, ribs, bolt recesses and bosses, but design freedom is not unlimited. Abrupt thickness changes and isolated heavy junctions create feeding and thermal risks. EB China reviews manufacturability against the approved drawing.
| Casting item | Engineering focus | Buyer input | Release evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pattern/tooling | Allowance, draft and parting | Approved 2D/3D revision | First-article dimensions |
| Gating/feeding | Fill and soundness | Critical load/wear areas | Qualified process/inspection |
| Cores/recesses | Support and cleaning access | Hole and recess function | Profile/dimension check |
| Riser removal | No damage to functional faces | Finish criteria | Visual/dimensional inspection |
| Traceability mark | Readable without weakening part | Marking location | Part-to-heat link |
Section transitions determine casting risk
A thick boss next to a thin wall freezes and cools differently, which can promote shrinkage, segregation, distortion or a different heat-treated structure. Generous fillets and gradual transitions reduce stress concentration and help process control.
Before copying a worn sample, restore original thickness and review whether the old geometry caused failure. A material upgrade without correcting an exposed edge, thin ligament or rocking backing often repeats the same problem at higher cost.
Austenitizing prepares the matrix
Austenitizing temperature and time are selected for the grade, prior structure and section. The process must prepare the intended transformation without excessive grain growth, oxidation or decarburization. Furnace uniformity, load arrangement and actual casting temperature matter.
No universal set point is stated on this product page. The supplier process and qualification evidence govern, while the buyer specifies final condition and contractual records rather than copying an internet recipe.
Quenching develops the section response
Quench medium, temperature, agitation, transfer delay, load spacing and geometry control cooling. The Cr-Mo system helps hardenability, but heavy sections still respond differently from thin edges. Excessive severity increases crack and distortion risk; insufficient severity can leave an unintended soft structure.
The production plan should connect casting support, safe transfer and thermal-lot identity. If distortion affects fit, define post-treatment dimensional checks and permitted correction methods.
Tempering makes the condition usable
A freshly hardened medium-carbon steel can be too stressed and brittle for a bolted impact liner. Tempering adjusts hardness, toughness and stability. Chromium and molybdenum influence softening and carbide reactions, so time and temperature must be matched to the complete chemistry.
Final hardness and required mechanical evidence are measured after the last specified thermal cycle. Do not require maximum hardness without considering impact, edges, bolts and maintenance handling.
| Thermal stage | Objective | Variable | Failure controlled |
|---|---|---|---|
| Load/preheat | Reduce gradients | Arrangement and ramp | Distortion/nonuniformity |
| Austenitize | Prepare transformation | Temperature, hold, section | Grain growth/incomplete response |
| Quench | Develop intended structure | Medium, delay, agitation | Cracking or soft core |
| Temper | Balance hardness/toughness | Temperature/time | Brittleness or over-softening |
| Verify | Confirm final condition | Method and location | Unrepresentative certificate |
Microstructure and mechanical evidence
The delivery structure may be described using pearlitic, bainitic or tempered-martensitic concepts depending on the approved condition. Those labels need sampled evidence and cannot be inferred from chemistry. Metallography should define location, preparation, etchant, magnification and acceptance description.
Impact or tensile requirements need specimen type, orientation, temperature and relationship to the production casting. Separately cast coupons are convenient but may not represent a heavy liner. Use an agreed representative block or sacrificial casting when section equivalence is important.
| Test | Define | What it supports | Representation caution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | Elements, limits and sample basis | Material identity | Does not prove structure |
| Hardness | Scale, points and range | Delivery response | Surface may not equal core |
| Impact | Specimen/notch and temperature | Toughness screening | Do not compare unlike specimens |
| Metallography | Location and criteria | Sampled structure | One coupon is local |
| NDT | Method, zones and acceptance | Discontinuity control | Geometry affects capability |
Credible chute applications
L2B cast steel can be evaluated in crusher-discharge transitions, receiving or impact zones, ore/clinker chutes, transfer-point components and other positions combining abrasion with impact or gouging. Cast geometry may be helpful when a flat fabricated plate cannot reproduce ribs, bosses or curvature.
Suitability requires duty data. Fine low-stress sliding may favor high-Cr white iron or Ni-Hard; very high contact stress may favor work-hardening manganese steel; straightforward fabricated panels may favor NM plate. Select by wear mechanism rather than brand name.
| Duty | L2B assessment | Compare |
|---|---|---|
| Moderate impact plus abrasion | Strong candidate after property/section review | Si-Cr-Mn-Mo or other Cr-Mo cast steel |
| Fine severe sliding, full support | May use toughness that is not needed | High-Cr white iron/Ni-Hard |
| Very high repeated contact stress | Evaluate work-hardening alternative | Mn-Cr manganese steel |
| Field-fabricated flat panels | Casting may add unnecessary tooling | NM wear plate |
| Loose backing/edge shock | Correct installation first | No alloy substitutes for support |

L2B versus L2A and L2C
L2A uses a lower published carbon range and no listed Mo in the common screening table. L2C uses higher C and Cr with Mo. L2B sits between them chemically, but that does not make it a universal compromise. Heat treatment, section and required toughness can move the best decision.
If a buyer requests an alternative, the quotation should compare chemistry, delivery condition, properties and risks. Do not substitute L2C merely because it looks higher on a table.
| Family | C wt.% | Cr wt.% | Mo wt.% | Selection emphasis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L2A screening | 0.45-0.55 | 0.80-1.20 | Not listed | Moderate hardness potential/toughness review |
| L2B screening | 0.55-0.65 | 0.80-1.50 | 0.2-0.4 | Cr-Mo heat-treated balance |
| L2C screening | 0.70-0.90 | 1.30-2.40 | 0.2-0.4 | High hardness potential with greater fracture caution |
L2B versus high-Cr white iron
High-Cr white iron uses a carbide-dominant strategy and substantially higher carbon/chromium families. It can excel in supported sliding abrasion but is more sensitive to impact and unsupported edges. L2B is a heat-treated alloy steel with a different matrix and fracture response.
Compare by duty, not just HRC. White iron may show higher hardness while L2B provides more usable impact tolerance. The wrong support or joint can defeat either material.
L2B versus high-manganese steel
High-manganese steel relies on an austenitic matrix and service-induced work hardening under sufficient contact stress. L2B develops its delivered properties primarily through its C-Cr-Mo chemistry and heat treatment.
Use manganese steel where repeated severe impact can activate a hardened surface while retaining a tough core. Use L2B where a pre-engineered heat-treated matrix and cast shape better match combined wear. Confirm with comparable field data.
L2B versus Si-Cr-Mn-Mo cast steel
ZG42Cr2Si2MnMo uses lower carbon than the L2B screening range but deliberately elevated silicon and a broader public Mo range. The two families have different transformation and tempering behavior. They are not equivalents despite both containing Cr and Mo.
A technical comparison should include chemistry, section, thermal route, hardness/toughness targets, manufacturing history and field failure. EB China can review both against the same liner map.
| Family | Element signature | Property strategy | Main question |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS2074 L2B | C-Cr-Mo medium-carbon steel | Quench/temper or approved heat-treated balance | Does section achieve hardness with adequate toughness? |
| ZG42Cr2Si2MnMo | C-Si-Mn-Cr-Mo elevated-Si steel | Alloy/thermal response in custom casting | Does Si-rich chemistry suit the target condition? |
| High-Cr iron | High C-Cr-Mo carbide system | Carbides resist sliding abrasion | Is impact/support controlled? |
| Mn-Cr steel | High-Mn austenitic system | Service work hardening | Is contact stress sufficient? |

Fixing, backing and joint design
The liner must bear against the intended support without rocking. Bolt holes and recesses need adequate ligament and radii. Flow-facing joints should avoid exposed edges and uncontrolled packing. Lifting features must be approved for declared mass.
Provide the full liner map and installation method. Chemistry cannot compensate for a damaged shell, loose bolts, an unsupported span or an incorrect overlap. Record backing and fixing condition during field trials.
| Interface | Requirement | Failure controlled |
|---|---|---|
| Backing face | Designed bearing/contact and finish | Rocking/bending |
| Bolts/studs | Property, hole/recess and tightening method | Loosening and local cracks |
| Panel joint | Flow direction, gap/step/overlap | Edge impact and ingress |
| Lifting | Mass and approved lifting feature | Unsafe handling |
| Welding | Only qualified grade-specific procedure | HAZ cracking/uncontrolled structure |
Dimensional, visual and NDT inspection
Inspect outline, thickness, datums, profile, bolt features, bearing surfaces, flatness and mass against the approved drawing. Visual examination addresses cracks, hot tears, fins, adhering material and specified surface conditions.
NDT requires a suitable method, defined zones, sensitivity and acceptance criteria. Generic “100% UT” is not a complete requirement. Agree the plan before production, when geometry and process can still be adjusted.
Traceability and document package
Permanent or durable marking should connect part number, drawing revision and heat/batch to chemistry, thermal and inspection records. The packing list should map each crate and quantity. Electronic files should use the same identifiers as the physical casting.
A typical agreed package may include heat analysis, heat-treatment confirmation, hardness and mechanical reports, dimensions, NDT, marking and packing photographs. Only documents required by the quotation are contractual.
| Document | Links | Buyer use |
|---|---|---|
| Material certificate | Grade, heat and chemistry | Confirms alloy identity |
| Thermal record/certificate | Heat/batch and condition | Confirms processing link |
| Hardness/mechanical report | Specimen/location and lot | Checks delivery properties |
| Dimension/NDT report | Part, revision and result | Releases fit/integrity |
| Packing list/photos | Crate, part and quantity | Supports receipt/traceability |

Field validation plan
Record baseline ID, thickness, mass where practical, hardness points, backing and photographs. During service, track tonnes or hours, feed size, trajectory, abnormal impacts, fixing condition and thickness on a numbered grid. Compare the same position and duty.
At removal, classify wear, gouging, fracture, bolt damage, deformation or support failure. Evaluate cost per processed tonne, replacement exposure and downtime—not calendar life alone. Feed the result into the next alloy and geometry decision.
Common RFQ mistakes
Avoid ordering “Cr-Mo steel” without grade and edition, copying a generic chemistry table, demanding maximum hardness, ignoring the heavy section, treating L2B as white iron, assuming welding is routine or specifying NDT without acceptance. Do not reproduce a worn sample without restoring intended geometry.
The remedy is to connect application, drawing, composition, casting route, heat treatment, properties, inspection, installation and field evidence in one approved package.
RFQ checklist
Send the AS2074 edition, L2B or approved modification, chemistry, delivery condition, hardness and required mechanical evidence. Provide 2D/3D drawing, revision, liner map, quantity, mass, sections, fixing, machining and marking.
Describe material handled, maximum lump, impact/drop, abrasion, throughput, moisture, temperature, present material, wear map and failure mode. State inspection, witness, documentation, packing and delivery requirements.
| RFQ field | Provide | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Material | AS2074 L2B edition/modified limits | Defines identity |
| Duty | Impact, abrasion, lump, throughput, temperature | Checks application fit |
| Drawing | Sections, joints, fixing and datums | Controls casting/fit |
| Thermal condition | Heat treatment and evidence | Controls final response |
| QA | Chemistry, hardness, mechanical/NDT/dimensions | Defines release |
| History | Exposure and failure map | Targets actual problem |
Engineering and safety boundary
Final material, geometry, structure, support, fixing and installation require customer and qualified-engineer approval. EB China manufactures to the approved drawing and purchase specification. Chemistry and hardness do not guarantee service life.
Inspection and replacement require isolation/lockout, stored-energy control, lifting, working-at-height and confined-space procedures as applicable. Welding, heating or modification needs an approved grade-specific method.
Request an AS2074 L2B C-Cr-Mo liner quotation
Send the drawing, grade/edition, duty and wear history or email wear@ebcastings.com. Read the paired AS2074 L2A/L2B/L2C composition guide and compare ZG42Cr2Si2MnMo liners.
Technical basis and disclosure
Composition ranges are public EB group capability screening data. Standards must be verified from the current authorized full text before contractual use. Images disclose EB ownership or third-party license and do not prove the alloy of a pictured part.
The paired technical article provides deeper grade comparison; this product page is the procurement path for drawing-based L2B review, manufacture and quotation.


Reviews
There are no reviews yet.